The recent announcement by Peter Dutton to cap international student numbers at 240,000, increase visa fees up to $5,000, and limit enrolments at public universities to 75% domestic students is a bold political move—but is it the right one?

The argument suggests that the housing crisis is being driven by international students.

This move may appear to address housing pressures—but at what cost? Our reputation as a leading education destination is already under pressure. Do we want to discourage top global talent, put universities under financial strain, and potentially shift students to more welcoming countries like Canada or the UK?

But let’s look at the facts:

  • International education is Australia’s 4th largest export, contributing over $48 billion to the economy and supporting more than 250,000 jobs.
  • LNP’s cap could cost the economy $5.8 billion and result in the loss of 22,000 jobs, according to Universities Australia.
  • Studies, including those from the Property Council and the University of South Australia, show no clear link between student numbers and rent increases.
  • The Student Accommodation Council confirms purpose-built student housing has minimal impact on the broader rental market.

We need serious housing policy, not scapegoating.

Let’s invest in real solutions: more housing, better urban planning, and continued support for a thriving international education sector that benefits all Australians.

What’s your take on the announcement? Is this a smart policy—or political shortsightedness?

#InternationalStudents #EducationMatters #AustraliaEducation #EdTech #StudyAustralia #Election2025 #PoliticalLeadership  #Populism #HousingCrisis #AustralianEconomy #FactCheckAustralia #educli